Evaluation Incomplete

Individual Presentation - Multiple Evaluators Form

Course:Presenter:Evaluator:

FACTORPoorFairExpected
Avg to Good
Good
to
Excellent
Exceptional
A. SUBJECT/TOPIC
(Quality, depth & Thoroughness course/field)
Shallow, irrelevant or Mickey Mouse Questionable value, marginal relevance, routine or outdated issue(s) Meaningful, Useful, Appropriate depth, covers all current issue(s) Helpful, focused, thought provoking and addresses emerging issue(s) Uniquely informative, clever
B. RIGOR & APPLICATION OF TECHNOLOGY
(Level of work & analysis demonstrated by student)
Insufficient level of work, less than expected for this assignment Superficial or Minimal, issues not fully addressed, or analytical tools lacking Expected and appropriate level of student work. Analytical tools & technology applied Considerable and meaningful student effort evident, Integrative use of Technology Extensive level of work by student, well beyond expectations, appropriate analytical tools used extensively
C. KNOWLEDGE, STUDENT UNDERSTANDING
(Grasp of the topic/issue/field)
Little representation of understanding, misapplied or irrelevant issues addressed General regurgitation of the work of others, intuitive, unclear level of understanding Student understanding of topic exhibited, used analytical reasoning Demonstrated a good understanding of the concepts and principles, clearly knowledgeable Extraordinary grasp of project, subject and issues
D. CONTRIBUTION, CREATIVITY AND INSIGHT
(Added value & thought process exhibited)
Copying of verbiage from sources, little evidence of creativity, mostly intuitive opinions Some original creativity apparent, less than expected student input/analysis Student input, analysis and creativeness evident in relation to the project Obvious and significant added value, student thoughts clearly provided Innovative, Visionary
E. MEDIA USAGE
(Use of presentation media & tools)
Poor preparation, information not presented clearly Average to Fair Mix , overhead slides only or handouts used only Reasonable to good mix of media, easy to follow. (Power Point) Diverse mix of media, excellent graphic tools (PowerPoint used well) Dynamic, considerable creativity shown(Power Point & Others)
F. GRAPHICS
(meaningful charts, drawings, graphs and/or diagrams)
Poor or no graphics used, did not use analytical techniques/tools well Graphic used, but inadequate to convey message clearly Good form and format, interesting and appropriate graphics Excellent format, easy to quickly understand, effective graphics Outstanding, Animated (figuratively or literally)
G. ORGANIZATION
(Logical progression, continuity, focus & flow)
Obvious effort to fill space, and/or difficult to follow OK, but somewhat rambling, or repetitious Good organization, reasonable content, and nice flow Very well organized, logical, easy to follow, interesting and focused Excellent presentation, skilful organization, enjoyable
H. TECHNIQUE
(Presenter's techniques & confidence)
Poor projection of voice, focused on screen or notes too much Reading, choppy or awkward presentation, uncomfortable Good presentation, effective, and confidence exhibited Smooth, seamless professional presentation Extraordinary and skilled presentation
I. PREPAREDNESS
(Ability to respond to questions)
Unprepared, unable to answer basic questions, evasive answers Most answers acceptable, additional preparation would be helpful, needed Thoughtful responses, relevant and appropriate answers Obvious preparation, well formulated and thorough answers Prepared for all questions, with backup information, undaunted
J. TIME
(Length of Presentation)
Excessive stretching or compression, or off by more than 25% allowed Off by 10-20%, or Distractive stretching or compression Within 10% of time, Appropriate for the material covered Comfortably accomplished within allotted time Precise including ample time for question and answer session